Favorable efficacy of S-1 treatment for locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is usually treated with surgery; however, locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma can be difficult to resect. Although recent guidelines from Western countries recommend using anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies, including cemiplimab and pembrolizumab, there are no approved anti-PD-1 antibodies for locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Asian countries. S-1 is an oral drug with a low incidence of severe toxicity that can be used for head and neck cancers, including head and neck locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, in Japan. We retrospectively evaluated patients with head and neck locoregional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with S-1 at two Japanese institutions (2008-2022). The initial dosage was determined by the body surface area (<1.25 m2 : 80 mg/day, 1.25-1.5 m2 : 100 mg/day, ≥1.5 m2: 120 mg/day) for 28 consecutive days. The outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Fourteen patients were included. The ORR was 78%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 64.3%. The median PFS and OS were not reached (NR) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 months-NR) and NR (95% CI, 13.8 months-NR), respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS rates were 51% and 85%, respectively. Six of the nine patients who achieved CR showed no recurrence during the follow-up period (median follow-up, 24.7 months). After CR, three patients experienced recurrence. Among these, two resumed S-1 treatment and subsequently underwent salvage surgery, resulting in a sustained absence of recurrence. One patient developed lung metastasis and died, although S-1 therapy was resumed. Only one patient (7.1%) developed grade 3 anemia. S-1 showed favorable efficacy and low toxicity in patients with head and neck locoregionally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. S-1 may be a good alternative to the anti-PD-1 antibody for treating head and neck locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma.

Elevated serum osteopontin levels in patients with severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Osteopontin (OPN) was initially described as a protein involved in bone metabolism, but the roles played by OPN in the immune system and allergic reactions have attracted increasing attention. Here, we clarify the OPN-related dynamics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, and assess whether the OPN level has utility for classifying such reactions and serving as a biomarker of severity. Serum OPN levels in patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and erythema multiforme-type drug reaction (EM-DR) were quantified by ELISA. The OPN sources were analyzed by dual immunofluorescence assay of DIHS, SJS/TEN and EM-DR biopsy specimens. The serum OPN levels of DIHS/DRESS patients (489.1 ± 37.0 ng/mL) and SJS/TEN patients (508.5 ± 47.8 ng/mL) were significantly higher compared with controls (314.4 ± 14.3 ng/mL; p < 0.001). After treatment, the serum OPN level of DIHS/DRESS patients decreased to that of controls. In addition, OPN levels in DIHS/DRESS patients and SJS/TEN patients were higher than in patients with EM-DR (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05). However, when the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the OPN levels among the three groups of patients, the difference was not significant (p = 0.055). Dual immunofluorescence assay revealed that T lymphocytes and macrophages were the main OPN sources in DIHS, SJS/TEN and EM-DR patients. These data suggest that the OPN level can be used to evaluate the severity of inflammation in patients experiencing drug reactions.

Increased expression of human herpes virus 6 receptor CD134/OX40 in skin lesions of patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.

CD134/OX40, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, is a cell-specific receptor for human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) variant B. Patients with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) present a significant increase in CD134 expression in peripheral blood CD4+ T cells. We aimed to investigate the frequency of CD134+ CD4 T cells infiltrating skin lesions in patients with DIHS/DRESS and its association with disease severity. We retrospectively included 21 patients with DIHS/DRESS and 11 patients with erythema multiforme (EM). By immunohistochemistry, the frequency of CD134+ CD4 T cells in DIHS was significantly higher than that in EM (p = 0.0083). The DIHS/DRESS severity score was significantly correlated with the frequency of CD134+ CD4 T cells (p = 0.0272); moreover, there was a significant difference between severe and mild/moderate cases. Double immunofluorescence staining revealed that numerous cells presented CD134/CD4 and CD134/Foxp3 overlap in patients with DIHS/DRESS. These data suggest increased susceptibility to HHV-6 infection at localized skin sites. HHV-6 may be involved in the mechanism underlying the progression and pathophysiology of DIHS/DRESS.

Adrenaline autoinjector is under-prescribed in typical cold urticaria patients living in tropical climate countries.

Background: The diagnosis of typical cold urticaria (ColdU) relies on whealing in response to local cold stimulation testing (CST). It can also manifest with cold-induced anaphylaxis (ColdA). Till date, it is largely unclear how often patients with ColdU receive adrenaline treatment and are provided with an adrenaline autoinjector (AAI). Methods: An international, cross-sectional study, COLD-CE (i.e., comprehensive evaluation of ColdU and other cold-induced reactions), was carried out at 32 UCAREs. Detailed histories were taken and CST with an ice cube and/or TempTest® performed. ColdA was defined as an acute cold-induced (i.e., by cold water, air, or surfaces) involvement of the skin and/or visible mucosal tissue and at least one of the symptoms (cardiovascular manifestations, difficulty breathing, or gastrointestinal symptoms). Results: Of the 551 ColdU patients, 75% (n = 412) had a positive CST. Of them, concomitant chronic spontaneous urticaria was diagnosed in 10%. Of 372 patients with stand-alone ColdU, 69% were women and 91% adults. Their median age was 36 (IQR 26 - 48) years. Patients were also categorized into residents of countries with a tropical (n = 33), temperate (n = 264), or cold (n = 75) climate (Table 1: R13C1, R17C1, R21C1). AAI was more often prescribed to residents of temperate than tropical countries (30% vs. 12%, p = .038; Table 1: R31C1), although the frequency of ColdA did not significantly differ between these countries (44% vs. 42%, p = 1.000; R29C2). Residents of tropical countries had a higher frequency of ColdA induced by cold air than residents of temperate (36% vs. 12%, p = .001; R29C4) or cold (36% vs. 12%, p = .007; R25C4) countries. Cardiovascular manifestations induced by cold air were diagnosed in 33% (n = 11) of residents of tropical countries, but only 18% (n = 2) and 36% (n = 4) of them had received adrenaline and AAI, respectively (R13 - 15C7). Furthermore, hypotension and/or loss of consciousness induced by cold air occurred in 18% (n = 6) of patients, but only 17% (n = 1) received adrenaline (R13 - 14C10). ColdA was induced by complete cold water immersion in 9% (n = 3) of patients, and none of them received adrenaline treatment nor AAI (R13 - 15C3). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that ColdA is undertreated and call for changes in ColdU management.

Risk factors for systemic reactions in typical cold urticaria: Results from the COLD-CE study.

BACKGROUND: Cold urticaria (ColdU), that is, the occurrence of wheals or angioedema in response to cold exposure, is classified into typical and atypical forms. The diagnosis of typical ColdU relies on whealing in response to local cold stimulation testing (CST). It can also manifest with cold-induced anaphylaxis (ColdA). We aimed to determine risk factors for ColdA in typical ColdU. METHODS: An international, cross-sectional study COLD-CE was carried out at 32 urticaria centers of reference and excellence (UCAREs). Detailed history was taken and CST with an ice cube and/or TempTest® performed. ColdA was defined as an acute cold-induced involvement of the skin and/or visible mucosal tissue and at least one of: cardiovascular manifestations, difficulty breathing, or gastrointestinal symptoms. RESULTS: Of 551 ColdU patients, 75% (n = 412) had a positive CST and ColdA occurred in 37% (n = 151) of the latter. Cold-induced generalized wheals, angioedema, acral swelling, oropharyngeal/laryngeal symptoms, and itch of earlobes were identified as signs/symptoms of severe disease. ColdA was most commonly provoked by complete cold water immersion and ColdA caused by cold air was more common in countries with a warmer climate. Ten percent (n = 40) of typical ColdU patients had a concomitant chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). They had a lower frequency of ColdA than those without CSU (4% vs. 39%, p = .003). We identified the following risk factors for cardiovascular manifestations: previous systemic reaction to a Hymenoptera sting, angioedema, oropharyngeal/laryngeal symptoms, and itchy earlobes. CONCLUSION: ColdA is common in typical ColdU. High-risk patients require education about their condition and how to use an adrenaline autoinjector.

Allergic contact dermatitis due to the liquid skin adhesive Dermabond® predominantly occurs after the first exposure.

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of patients with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) due to a skin adhesive containing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, Dermabond®, have not yet been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with ACD caused by Dermabond® application. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 577 patch tested patients were included. We identified patients with positive patch test results for Dermabond® and evaluated their results concerning (meth)acrylates and ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive. RESULTS: Nine patients had positive patch test results to Dermabond®; six had developed secondary generalization.The mean time between Dermabond® application and ACD onset was 34 days (range, 27-44) in six patients with ACD after the first use, whereas, in the other three patients, it was 5.6 days (range, 4-8) after the second use. The time was significantly different between the two groups (P < .01). Positive reactions to ethyl cyanoacrylate adhesive (Aron Alpha) occurred in seven of nine patients, to ethyl cyanoacrylate 10% pet. in four of eight patients tested, and to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in one of eight patients tested. CONCLUSIONS: Dermabond®-induced ACD is apparently characterized by a high prevalence of primary sensitization at first exposure to Dermabond®, secondary generalization is frequent, and most patients show cross-reactivity to ethyl cyanoacrylate.

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically disrupts health care around the globe. The impact of the pandemic on chronic urticaria (CU) and its management are largely unknown. AIM: To understand how CU patients are affected by the COVID-19 pandemic; how specialists alter CU patient management; and the course of CU in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cross-sectional, international, questionnaire-based, multicenter UCARE COVID-CU study assessed the impact of the pandemic on patient consultations, remote treatment, changes in medications, and clinical consequences. RESULTS: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impairs CU patient care, with less than 50% of the weekly numbers of patients treated as compared to before the pandemic. Reduced patient referrals and clinic hours were the major reasons. Almost half of responding UCARE physicians were involved in COVID-19 patient care, which negatively impacted on the care of urticaria patients. The rate of face-to-face consultations decreased by 62%, from 90% to less than half, whereas the rate of remote consultations increased by more than 600%, from one in 10 to more than two thirds. Cyclosporine and systemic corticosteroids, but not antihistamines or omalizumab, are used less during the pandemic. CU does not affect the course of COVID-19, but COVID-19 results in CU exacerbation in one of three patients, with higher rates in patients with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic brings major changes and challenges for CU patients and their physicians. The long-term consequences of these changes, especially the increased use of remote consultations, require careful evaluation.

Gibberellin-regulated protein allergy: Clinical features and cross-reactivity.

Gibberellin-regulated proteins (GRPs)/GASA proteins are members of cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptide families and are conserved in a broad range of plants. Some GRPs in fruits and pollens have been identified as allergens including peach Pru p 7, Japanese apricot Pru m 7, orange Cit s 7, pomegranate Pun g 7, and cypress pollen GRP. The clinical features of fruit-derived GRP allergies frequently include systemic reactions, multiple fruit allergies regardless of plant kingdom classifications and, less frequently, cofactor-dependence. Multiple fruit allergies might be related to cross-reactivity between GRPs. Clinical cross-reactivity, at least between the four fruit-derived GRPs, has been proven. In addition, GRP allergy induces peculiar clinical symptoms, such as laryngeal tightness and facial swelling, especially eyelid edema, which was proposed to be a predictive factor for Pru p 7 allergy. Fruit-derived GRPs have an unusually high content of cysteine, resulting in high stability to heat and resistance to digestive enzymes. Therefore, GRPs are considered "true" food allergens that induce severe allergic reactions. As an alternative mechanism of fruit-derived GRP allergies, cross-reactivity between fruit GRP and cypress pollen GRP, which might play a role as a sensitizer, is suspected. Taken together, these characteristics indicate GRPs are clinically relevant plant allergens. This review article summarizes our current knowledge of the clinical features and important aspects of GRP sensitization and allergy.